The Bottom Line

We watched the video The Lottery in Part IV. which highlights the tragic fact that getting a good education frequently depends on luck. I examined the documentary's main points and spoke about what it showed about structural injustices in public education, particularly for low income families and communities of color, using the Agree, Argue, Assume, Aspire reflection approach.

The documentary's focus on the moral and emotional significance of this issue was what I agreed with the most. It brought to light the tragic fact that a child's education is frequently based on their zip code. I was really struck by how unjust it is when I saw the scenes where parents wait in the hopes that their child's name will be picked in the school lottery. The future of a family shouldn't depend on luck. It's clear how important this injustice is. The documentary, in my opinion, made clear how severely low income families and communities of color are impacted. It also goes past the standard of education. It affects a person's entire life and their access to opportunities. The idea that something just as location affects children's destiny stuck with me. I disagreed with the film's focus on charter schools as the primary means of improving public education, even while I support its sense of urgency. Charter schools have disadvantages such as less monitoring and the fact that public schools sometimes lose money when kids transfer, even though they may provide certain students with better possibilities. I argued in my reflection that The Lottery appeared too biased. It didn't go into enough detail about the disadvantages of charter schools or how funding them may steal funds from public schools. Improving education, in my opinion, involves funding all schools rather than just giving a chosen few students a better opportunity. Regardless of the type of school they attend, every child deserves an excellent education.

I focused on the powerful story that affected the documentary's message when I looked into its assumptions.  I thought it pushed the idea that families had no other option but to send their children to charter schools.  Although the lottery drawing scenes were important, they also helped reinforce the idea that public schooling had already failed. People might think that charter schools are naturally better as a result of this emotional focus, which isn't always the case.  In my answer, I highlighted how the documentary suggests that the conventional public system is doomed, which is a harmful idea to promote.  Public schools need to be supported and reformed, not completely abandoned.

My main goal is to see a time when no child must depend on chance to receive a quality education. Watching The Lottery made me realize how awful it is that a random drawing determines a family's greatest chance at a better life. In my answer, I pictured an educational system where all students have an equal opportunity and where obtaining a quality education is independent of success. I think we can strive for that. Education must no longer be viewed as a privilege but rather as the fundamental right that it is.

.